[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> > without further adjustment or tweaking. Ideally, this would mean that
> > the review version would be complete with figures, and it would use the
> > same CSS as the final version. (I realize relative links demand too
> > much.) So far, the CSS is the only problem I've encountered.
> I will try to get a file upload utility done ASAP so people that want to
> upload flies not using zwiki can do it without problems. Then the zwiki
> TOC will just link to that independent resources. This way customized
> CSS files can be uploaded and images too.

That sounds fabulous. One thing though (well, one thing with tendrels) ...
I've created a link using the DoubleCaps mojo, but I don't understand from
this how I would link to a resource such as an image (wiki uses some ODB
rather than FS, yaa?). And, related to this, would everything uploaded appear
as a link on ToC?

> Hopefully by the mid of next week, I will have this working. Thanks for the
> suggestion.

*heh ... such a positive attitude he has!  grin*

> alex

hfx_ben

p.s. As a test, I threw in a whole page formatted for m.o. ... I had to
comment out <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.79 [en] (Win95; U)
[Netscape]">
I've just put it back to the original so you can see the behaviour at
http://mozilla.freezope.org/docnotes/FullVersion


Reply via email to