fantasai wrote: > [...] > This citation: > 'Is not the attitude of the heroes of <i>MASH</i>, however, > precisely that of an active <i>disidentification</i>?' > (Žižek, <i>Plague</i> 22). > > as this: > 'Is not the attitude of the heroes of <citetitle>MASH</citetitle>, > however, precisely that of an active > <emphasis>disidentification</emphasis>?' > <citation>(Žižek, <citetitle>Plague</citetitle> > 22)</citation>. > > And this bibliographic entry: > <p style="text-indent: -1em; margin-left: 1em;">Žižek, > Slavoj. <i>The Plague of Fantasies</i>. Wo Es War. Ed. > Žižek. Verso. London: New Left Books, 1997.</p> > > as this: > <bibliomixed>Žižek, Slavoj. <citetitle>The Plague of > Fantasies</citetitle>. Wo Es War. Ed. Žižek. > Verso. London: New Left Books, 1997.</bibliomixed> > [...]
This stuff is delicious ... makes me smack my lips! On the strength of examples like this, and using WP5.1, I created something like an ontology for an R&D project's docs, and it worked like a charm, once it was in place. (As needed, I could affect changes on the entire document set using WP macros.) But I have to wonder about ramifications; I can see DocBook on the horizon, but when does this sort of markup begin? Will no document be viewable publically on zope until/unless it has reached that degree of correctness? > ~fantasai hfx_ben
