Fred wrote: > mimic MSDN as closely as possible.
I'd like to stipulate that we try to only mimic good things, not bad things. :) > I would like to point out that our discussion about content organization > here has no bearing on how the files containing the content are actually > stored on disk Actually, I would like to have the site navigational structure to build on the URI structure. The URI is an important part of the navigation UI, especially with the tech-savvy community we have here. I understand that we need to have a flexible overall structure. The list of Mozilla-relevant technologies is long and has no inherent hierarchy; this is why I want to keep the top level flat. But once we've entered the topic's directory, the content should be strongly organized where possible. I see the site as a set of small, tightly organized sections linked through and tied together by cross- links and meta-topics (like "Application Development"). The organization within each section should be bound to the URI structure; the navigation flow among them is governed by links. My favorite quote from the URI discussions - "The navigational structure is a web, more or less. But a good web-- an organized web--has strong spokes for filaments to attach to, and those spokes are the URI hierarchy. They maintain organization, provide a well-defined path for navigation, and can be oriented to when lost." <http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/web-design/> ~fantasai _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
