Chris Seawood wrote:
>
> Chris McAfee wrote:
> >
> > I'm taking a look at what the embed guys have
> > done with embed.mk and BUILD_MODULES, it still
> > looks kinda hacky to me. My ultimate goal here is
> > to get the build simple enough to set up an
> > embed-only tinderbox.
>
> Sorry about the delayed response. Everything seems to be on the money
> except that I don't think that we need a cvs module for embedding. I
> had the impression that we were moving away from cvs modules, hence the
> magic that is client.mk.
>
Embedding will have customers that won't want to see
the rest of seamonkey. Presumeably we can solve some
of the dependency problems so we could only pull/build
what embedding really needs. This could be done as
a makefile target, or by a CVS module. Either way,
both have +/-'s.
-Chris
