Re: Windows 2001-09-04-05-trunk mfcembed smoketest results

[Adam Lock]

If not in porkjockeys then where? I believe that it should be posted somewhere prominent because the smoketest often lists bugs caused by changes made outside of embedding. Embedding is particularly susceptible to changes in the chrome, psm and componentization (manifests etc.).

In addition to this, people should be building and testing changes against the embedding clients whether they're interested in them or not. Embedding bugs often take hours to debug and keep the tree closed (for blockers) when a few moments testing by the change author with mfcEmbed or TestGtkEmbed may have avoided the problem altogther.

Adam

Alec Flett wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> What are the chances that we could stop publishing this report to the porkjockeys newsgroup? it's almost the same every day, and if people are worried about embedding-specific issues, they should be reading n.p.m.embedding anyway...those of us reading n.p.m.embedding have see this report twice every morning.

            Alec


Tracy Walker wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Windows 2001-09-04-05-trunk mfcembed smoketest results

- Embedding: PASS:

    - Bug #  70714 : Visited link doesn't change color

    - Bug #  97778   : http auth dialogue keeps popping up
 
 

-Tracy