What do you mean by "how big?" binary megabytes? what platform? maybe "Which dlls are needed?" for that I refer you to the basebrowser-* files - they provide details about what DLLs are needed, and for what purpose.
Alec Paul Rouleau wrote: > Just curious, but how big is the current runtime environment needed for just > the embedded piece? > > - Paul > > > > Alec Flett wrote: > > >>jeet - >>let's keep this conversation public, I think there are a number of >>people interested in this, and in fact this is part of my job here at >>Netscape - to untangle dependencies to reduce our code footprint... >> >>Here are a few bugs you might be interested in: >> >>Embedding dependency tracking bug: >>http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100107 >> >>Less-critical dependency tracking bug: >>http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106686 >> >>let's take this up on netscape.public.mozilla.embedding >> >>Alec >> >>jeet shahani wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I am broadcasting this to everyone as I am sure there are other like me >>>who would love to use a smaller footprint of Mozilla when embedding it >>>with java(or some other platform). I am using the WebClient API to >>>embed Mozilla in java. However, at this point I want to just start with >>>building Mozill with only the basic functionality. What would be ideal >>>is if we could use the basic functionality like Layout engine, >>>javascript and cache, etc to embed the upcoming Mozilla 1.0. >>> >>>Here are a few urls that I have been reading on this topic. >>>http://www.mozilla.org/projects/embedding/faq.html >>>http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/embedding/config/ >>> >>>If anyone else is interested in this effort, please email me. We can >>>discuss how to go about doing this. Anybody who has already done this >>>before or can provide input with this effort- that would be great. I >>>would like to also provide feedback to the initial draft that is created >>>by Alec and any feedback back to the WebClient community on this if >>>possible. >>> >>>R/ >>>Jeet >>> >> >
