In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frank Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And then where would we discuss mozilla.org policies in general? In > mozilla.general? The point of putting mozilla.org issues (policies, Web site, newsgroup naming, administrativia, etc.) in a group called "mozilla-org" is to separate those issues from "general", because most of the noise is likely to be dumped into "general". The description of "mozilla-org" just looks restrictive. I think there is an implied phrase "mozilla.org issues such as but not limited to" lurking in the desciption. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Mark Potts
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming jesus X
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Henri Sivonen
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Gervase Markham
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Newsgroup Renaming Ben Bucksch
