> > > hahahahahahhaa this is a good one, I'll remember it.
> >
> > I wouldn't laugh. Many people make the same mistake. That's why the new
> > version will be called ".quality". :-)
>
> Hmm. I didn't think of this during the original discussions on newsgroup
> renaming, but suddenly I can imagine the new ".quality" group getting
> posts like:
>
> "Netscape is such poor quality!!!"
That's more on-topic than most posts here. Anyway, I think the new names
will seriously reduce the overall number of Netscape-related questions.
> How about ".quality-testing"? Totally unambiguous, and I can't think of
> any erroneous interpretations.
Yeah, but it sounds ugly :-)
Gerv
