Up-state NY, U.S.A. wrote:
> Mark--I can't agree with you more.� And I can't possibly tell you how
> disappointed I was with my attempt at using Netscape 6.� I sent away for
> Netscape's CD rather than download the whole package.� Once installed, I
> found Netscape 6 to be:
>
> * Very slow (although it did tell me it needed a minimum of 233 MHz
> and 64 MB of Ram).
> * My Logitech mouse was no longer able to page...
> * My attempt at doing e-mail off-line failed.� Never did figure out
> where the e-mail went?
> * When I un-installed Netscape 6, I found that it had corrupted
> Windows98 thumbnail view for jpg and gif files.
> * I played with Netscape 6 for about two days and gave up...
Hi Gary,
Since you bothered to come to a Mozilla newsgroup to complain about
Netscape 6, I'm going to give a Mozillian answer :)
Download Mozilla 0.9, and enjoy :)
Fabian.
>
> So I'm now back running Netscape 4.7 and much happier with it.�
> Apparently I never reached the point you did; however, I'm also very
> disappointed to learn about the Java problem...
>
> Have a nice day, Gary
>
> Mark A Gregory wrote:
>
>
>>It has been posted that Netscape 6.01 is not Java compatible and
>>prevents signed applets from running.
>>
>>Signed applets cannot communicate with Javascript on web pages.
>>
>>Netscape has released a product that breaks most applets being used
>>today and prevents customers from supporting netscape on their
>>websites.
>>
>>When does netscape plan to release a 6.xx version that is not broken
>>but supports Java and java applet to javascript communication?
>>
>>This question has been put to Netscape and Sun officials but there is
>>no response forthcoming.
>>
>
