Rip Toren wrote: > > The connection goes either to the outside world, or localhost. How about > a security popup (and associated preference settings (allow, question, > deny)) concerning connection to the local host (localhost, > 127.0.0.1,myIP,etc). Then the user would be in some control when a page > attempted to use the somewhat priveleged state of having the socketpeer > being the local host. The URI I mentioned does *not* use localhost. "localhost" in the URI could be replaced with any arbitrary string and most SMTP servers would be happy with it. You can connect either to a mail server which is accepting mail for the recipient, or to mail server which supports relaying (e.g. your ISP's mail server). They can be anywhere in the net. The former can easily be found for every mail address via DNS. If you have a local mail server you could use "localhost" after the '@' too, but most users don't have one, so that is probably not the main problem. Clarence
Re: More top-secret BS commits with hidden bug reports
Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider) Thu, 07 Jun 2001 08:06:19 -0700
- Re: More top-secret BS co... hume . spamfilter
- Re: More top-secret BS co... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-secret ... Rip Toren
- Re: More top-sec... Stuart Ballard
- Re: More top-sec... Stuart Ballard
- Re: More top-sec... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: More top-sec... JTK
- Re: More top-sec... hume . spamfilter
- Re: More top-sec... Adam James Fitzpatrick
- Re: More top-sec... Rip Toren
- Re: More top-sec... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-sec... Mitchell Stoltz
- Re: More top-secret ... Jay Garcia
- Re: More top-sec... Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
- Re: More top-secret BS commits with hidden... David Hallowell
- Re: More top-secret BS commits with h... Gervase Markham
- Re: More top-secret BS commits with hidden... Gervase Markham