Anonymous wrote: > If the two source code trees are just about > the same, why bother making a netscape 6.1? > > Wouldn't it make more sense to just concentrate > all the effort on mozilla? > > --------== Posted Anonymously via Newsfeeds.Com ==------- > Featuring the worlds only Anonymous Usenet Server > -----------== http://www.newsfeeds.com ==---------- > Netscape 6.1 was produced by Netscape, Mozilla is made through the contributors of mozilla.org. There's no double effort here, and Netscape 's releases are Netscape's responsibilities, not mozilla.org's. Although it's possible to use it for everyday use, Mozilla is intended to provide the code that OTHER produces could be based off of. -- Alex <:3)~~ http://www.gerbilbox.com/newzilla/
- Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozilla? Anonymous
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Alex
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Jason Bassford
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Bren..
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Fernando Cassia
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Stuart Ballard
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mo... Bruce O'Neal
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Christopher Jahn
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when th... Jay Garcia
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there'... Jason Bassford
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... Carlfish
- Re: Why bother with Netscape 6.1 when there's mozill... John Dobbins