Chris Waterson wrote:
> Christopher Blizzard wrote:
>
Although it might've been hard for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep up with
the number of approval requests, I think they've done a terrific job!
Thanks guys!
I think the main reason that we improved stability was because of the
status updates we got from choffmann, marek and the other people
checking the 0.9.1 buglist with eagle-eyes.
People didn't bother to slip in unimportant stuff. I saw that everybody
worked very hard to work on only dataloss, crasher, mlk and usability
bugs! I think we should keep that system - having a bunch of people
frequently give status reports and have it organized like that. Work
only on bugs of high importance.
--
Håkan Waara