Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On 07 Jul 2001 22:59:55 +0200, You wrote:
>
>>For testing purposes, I saved the header.gif image and made my own
>>little testcase, a simple body and an img tag, with the height and width
>>you specified. I then checked the resulting page in Photoshop, measuring
>>the header.gif's size. Mozilla *is* resizing it to the specified height
>>and width, so I don't see a bug...
>>
> The bug is not whether the image is rendered at the correct size, but
> whether or not the rendering is quality is flawed or not.
>
>
>>Offtopic question: why resize it in the first place? Why not just crop
>>it to the size you want. Results in faster rendering of the page, as any
>>browser that encounters the page won't have to resize it first.
>>
> Don't believe that was the concern. Just whether or not there was
> something that Mozilla should handle better than it was.
that's why he mentioned "Offtopic question:" ;-)
--
e-mail
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web
: - http://www.pavlicek.de: private HP
- http://www.html-online.de: Einführung in HTML
- http://www.los-angeles2019.de: Blade Runner Fanpage
----------------------------------------------------------------