Garth Wallace wrote:
> "Peter Lairo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>jesus X wrote:
>>
>>>>but might not post it in security (I too do not subscribe to
>>>>n.p.m.security).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>This is your shortcoming, not Gerv's.
>>>
>>No, unfortunately, it would be Mozilla's shortcoming.
>>
>
> How is Gerv not subscribing to n.p.m.security a shortcoming
> in Mozilla? There's nothing stopping him from subscribing
> temporarily. I've done that myself when I had a question
> that belonged in a group I don't regularly follow (like netlib
> or ui).
You misunderstood. The shortcomming is that nobody is (likely) posting
this important question in n.p.m.security. And that is a shortcomming
for Mozilla.
--
Regards,
Peter Lairo