JTK wrote:
> Garth Wallace wrote:
>
>>"JTK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>>>What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
>>>"Mozilla isn't for users!", Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
>>>with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the "Mozila for end users".
>>>
>>Evidently JTK hasn't discovered an interesting
>>linguistic property known as "context".
>>
>>The builds provided by Mozilla are not intended
>>for end-users. The code produced by the Mozilla
>>project is not written for immediate consumption
>>by end users. However, it is written with the
>>understanding that other groups will package it
>>for use by end-users.
>>
>
> And that packaging in the case of AOL is a sticker that says "Netscape"
> overtop the one that says "Mozilla". What context did I miss there?
So where is mozilla.org's support infrastructure to look after all
these users? That's one thing these repackagers provide that Mozilla
certainly cannot.
ian.
--
\ /
(@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
| |
