JTK wrote:
>
> To Pratik, Blake, barney, Phillip, and the rest of the dozen or so folks
> who have used Composer in the past:
>
> Did you guys miss this part of my post?:
>
> "Ship it as a separate product." - Gary R. Van Sickle
>
> My one and only point here is that it has no business as part of a web
> browser/mail reader client. Don't read over "client". Of the literally
> hundreds of people who may eventually download Mozilla, 99% will do so
> to get a web browser, 90% will do so to get an email/newsreader, and >1%
> will do so to get a minimal web page editor. And yet all will get that
> web page editor, which they will never, ever, ever use.
>
> Does it have a minimal code size and memory impact on Mozilla? Nothing
> else about Mozilla does. Pull it out and show me the minimal
> difference.
I uderstand that. But If you use HTML in email and in some newsgroups
you "are" using Composer.
So although some people say the don't use Composer they really do.
Besides from my understanding the code for Composer takes up so little
of the entire Mozilla/netscape 6 package you'd be hard pressed to see
the difference in the download size of the entire package.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
