"Jason Bassford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > What's up with the funky 1930's Stallinist style of this artwork? Is it a > > > joke? > > It's called "constrictivist" and while there isn't a lot of choice, it's not a > > joke, and you're welcome to make your own. > > I know this thread has gone on ad nauseum. But only a few people > (relatively speaking) would NOT consider this to be a joke. I > certainly don't think it is a serious attempt to say something and, if > it is, it's in bad taste. Mozilla would do well to not actively > advertise. That's fine, because Mozilla doesn't actively advertise. Just wondering, why do you think it's so offensive? I see billboards done in a similar style all of the time.
- mozilla/netscape logo for websites Tom Christensen
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Frank Hecker
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Håkan Waara
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Abner
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Bernd Mielke
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites jesus X
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Jay Garcia
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Jason Bassford
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Garth Wallace
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Jason Bassford
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Jacek Piskozub
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites jesus X
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites kang4321
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Jacek Piskozub
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites jesus X
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites CaT
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Brian Z Jones
- Re: mozilla/netscape logo for websites Brian Z Jones