In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Malodushnikh wrote: > > No, that's an incorrect opinion by some very misled engineers who, for > some reason, believe that all files are faster when they're stored as > JAR files. >
Huh? AFAIK, the reason we use jars is to cut down on footprint, which seriously increases using uncompressed chrome. The fastload changes may have affected apparent loading speed and won back some of the time needed to uncompress-on-the-fly, but I'm not sure. -- Chris Hoess
