Adam D. Moss wrote: > This is a valid argument direction but pales rather compared > to (what is to me) the more fundamental fact that Mozilla supports > the 'right' way to be doing this so has pittifully-little excuse > to also be supporting (*and* *thus* *encouraging*) the 'wrong' way > by default.
I guess that depends on how you define 'wrong'. Obviously the 'wrongness' of this way of doing things is not universally accepted. --Mike
