[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JTK) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>the >overall theory of operation of Mozilla is to completely crap out >if an "I" isn't crossed or a "T" isn't dotted in the HTML*, but >what do you expect from AOL? I mean hell, it's not like they own >Time Warner or something! If IE had not been designed to render invalid HTML (i.e., guessing what the web page is *supposed* to look like), then there would not be all these load-of-crap HTML editors that produce invalid HTML, since users would discard them when they saw that their browser couldn't render the HTML produced. No, a browser should render only *valid* HTML. If that were the case, then there'd be no such thing as an HTML editor that produces invalid HTML. Can you imagine a compiler that would compile invalid code, making a guess as to exactly where you meant to put that END IF? That's just bloody stupid, and the rendering of invalid HTML is just as bloody stupid. -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
