In article <appc0r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, deelan wrote: > David Baron wrote: >> * Having an implementation of marquee improves our compatibility with >> the web, and we are a web browser. > that's fine. but just keep mozilla the real *reference* browser for > our poor web developers, i mean... > > i write html4+css pages following the specs, > i try it on mozilla, "great!" it works as expected. > i try the page on explorer6... mmm, some visual glitches. > > what's wrong? some bug in explorer? probably. a bug in mozilla? less > likely... wait a moment i check bugzilla. > > hence... at least in "standard compl. mode" keep things as > strict as possible.
the counter argument to that is that if you have html4+css following the specs, the implementation (or not) of marquee will make no difference - it doesn't break the standard, it just does something that isn't in the standard. > i would suggest to ignore maquee completely > in std. mode... or is it already done? it isn't. > bye see ya -- michael
