Does it make sense to add proxies to this document? Or is that addressed
in some other set of tests?
Ben Chuang wrote:
> Try again. There was a brief outage that weekend.
>
> Anandprasanna Gaitonde wrote:
>
>
>>Hello sir,
>>
>>I am interested in going thru the document which u have mentioned in the
>>link. but i was unable to access the link. Is there any problem with the
>>site . can u kindly let me know where the document is or if possible send it
>>to me.
>>
>>Thanking in advance
>>
>>Regards
>>Prasanna
>>
>>"Dan Mosedale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>9g83nf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9g83nf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>>>Ben Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>>Now that I've been doing network qa for netscape for a while, I've
>>>>started to realize there is a whole set of functionality that has not
>>>>been explicity explored, which I have tentatively called "general
>>>>connectivity".
>>>>
>>>>The document is in pretty horrible shape (being a draft from a quiet
>>>>Saturday morning), but a discussion in bug 84019 about modem and proxy
>>>>testing made me think I better post the draft, rather than continuing to
>>>>work on the document in the fast-LAN ivory tower we call the Netscape
>>>>Campus network...
>>>>
>>>>http://www.packetgram.com/pktg/mozilla/nettest.html
>>>>
>>>>Please read it and send your comments here, but be kind.
>>>>
>>>>benc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>This is great stuff! I think we've needed just this sort of analysis
>>>for a while; good work.
>>>
>>>Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>
