Ummm, is there such a thing as "reverse spam" where some batch process
pulls the neames of everyone subscribed to each of the newsgroups that
received this spam and sends a form letter from each on to the spammer.
Heh, Heh, Heh. I'll leave that to the code warriors among you.
Greg Sigmon wrote:
>
> Bill S.759 was passed by the House, but not the Senate. It was never made into
> law. Spammers like to quote this Bill to make you think they have the "right"
> to fill your mailbox with junk.
>
> Jon Robertson wrote:
>
> > > This mailing was done in accordance with Bill S.759, which regulates the
> > > transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic mail on the Internet.
> >
> > If that is the case, then it is a pretty useless Bill. For those that may
> > not know, the newgroup header on this message was so long that OE won't even
> > show the whole thing.
> > "netscape.public.mozilla.seamonkey,netscape.public.mozilla.security,netscape
> > .public.mozilla.svg,netscape.public.mozilla.ui,
> > netscape.public.mozilla.unix,netscape.public.mozilla.unix.checkins,netscape.
> > public.mozilla.webtools,netscape.public.mozilla.wi"
> >
> > According to the FAQ at http://www.themail.com, spamming is not allowed. I
> > don't know if the original message complied with Bill S. 759 or not. But I
> > do know it was SPAM.
> >
> > PLEASE, everyone go to http://www.themail.com/contact.ghc and let them know
> > that "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" spammed you.
> >
> > Jon
