Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > I'm still concerned by the fact that releases are driven by dates rather
> > than features and stability. I don't really think we can claim to have a
> > complete mozilla1.0 until it has some key features.
>
> Please re-read the original post, noting in particular the footnote
> associated with the 1.0 milestones:
Yes, but it's still the fact remains that the milestone is based on a date
rather then a set of features. What if css1 support isn't considered
complete May2001, will release of moz1.0 be held? Will it still be held tree
months later if there is still some major bug stopping css1 support?
> > > April 2001
> > > S M Tu W Th F S
> > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
> > > 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Mozilla 0.9.1 or 1.0*
> > > 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
> > > 29 30
> > > May 2001
> > > 1 2 3 4 5
> > > 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
> > > 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
> > > 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Mozilla 0.9.2 or 1.0*
> > > 27 28 29 30 31
> > >
> > > * depending on level of completion
> > > towards mozilla 1.0
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> --
> Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL
> Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--'
> +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \
> irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
>
>
