For Netscape engineers (but of interest to Mozilla community also).

There are two opportunities daily to argue for your bug in front of PDT:
* daily meeting at 12:00pm in Ironsides (with participation of drivers)
* afternoon daily PDT meeting at various times (around 4-4:30pm) and 
various locations
Mon 4:00 pm Jeffersons conference room 650 937 3992
Tue, Wed 4:30 pm Eng. Pit 21 650 937 3711
Thu 4:30 pm All in the Family 650 937 3988
Fri 3:30 pm also in All in the Family 650 937 3988 (I'm not certain 
about this location -- cannot check; cal server seems to be down)

In addition there's an e-mail only way -- if something is really urgent 
please send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regarding bugs that were targeted for 0.9.2 -- they were placed there as 
the bugs that were of not important to success of 0.9.1. Therefore, 
unless PDT or somebody else made a gross omission, I don't think you 
will be able to check them into 0.9.1. We have to have a stable product 
and usable and bugs dealing with stability will have the highest 
priority. We may, however, have a set of "Limbo" builds when we reach 
our 0.9.1 goal and if there's time remaining.

Marek


Scott Putterman wrote:

> After the triage we did for the mailnews bugs on Thursday I was told 
> that any bugs still in 0.9.1 had permission to be checked in after 
> going through the review process. What about new bugs that have come 
> up since?  I've been putting bugs like crashers into 0.9.1.  But, 
> people have also started getting fixes for bugs that are in 0.9.2 
> (some of the ones that were moved off) that we wouldn't mind having in 
> 0.9.1. Do I need to go to a PDT meeting and argue for them?  Can I 
> give them permission to check in if I don't think the fix is too risky?
>
> Scott



Reply via email to