Brendan Eich wrote:

> (Warren was right; waterson shouldn't have removed the REQUIRES 
> requirement!)

In my defense, I was fixing problems that occurred ~weekly in the source 
tree about a year-and-a-half ago.

1. Inconsistent support for REQUIRES across platforms led to platform 
bustage. For example, Mac ``automatically'' grovels through subtrees to 
find header files, meaning that a person who primarily developed on Mac 
would unwittingly introduce a new module dependency, breaking Win32 and 
Unix in the process.

2. Removing or moving header files leads to kooky build bustage in 
depend builds, especially on Win32. Because Win32 _copies_ the header 
files into $(DIST)/include, old versions of the headers tended to lurk 
around causing bizarre build-, and sometimes even run-time bustage. This 
is also a potential problem on Mac, where aliases continue to point to 
files that are in the ``Trash'', but less so.

These aren't horrible problems, but they tended to keep the tree closed 
because some people got good builds while others saw bustage or bizarre 
behavior.

The down-side, as was noted, is that it's all too easy to introduce 
bogo-dependencies. But we've got super-review now, right? ;-)

chris



Reply via email to