> > If they are important, these bugs should be picked up under other > criteria. Your point that only 10% of the bugs marked 4xp are ones you > think we need to fix for 1.0 shows that 4xp is not really a useful > indicator. > > Please use a newsreader that respects Followup-To: :-) > > Gerv
You misread what I said. I said 80-90% of the open bugs with 4xp parity also fall under some other critera for why they should be fixed for 1.0, whether it is that they are "Broken" 4xp bugs, or rendering/layout, or other stuff. This leaves, a rough guess, 10-20% which are grey area 4.x "features" and probably wont make it in before 1.0. But would it be unrealistic to get 485 4xp bugs to around 100 left before moz1.0.... I would hope not. As for respecting Follow-up-To: sorry, Outlook doesn't and I'm not gonna use moz just to post a message :) I use moz to browse sometimes, although it still is somewhat crippled (not its fault, its the sites fault, locking it out) on my personal banking page, so I still go to the old habit of launching IE6. Don't know if I'll ever go use Moz/Net mail, even in the old days I used another app besides it, the leet Pegasus Email client of its time :)
