In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, tradervik wrote: >> http://www.searchengineworld.com/opera/faceoff.htm > > At least one blatant lie: "Anything less a 600mhz on Moz is absurdly slow." > Guess my 450 Mhz machine has magically gotten 33% faster.
My main workstation (on which Mozilla has been my only browser for over a year) is a 266MHz, 96M Linux box. They claim 700MHz and 256M are needed in the "real world". Typical Opera-"wefitonafloppy,wellnotreallyanymore"-luser propaganda. They measured Moz startup w/o fastload (but of course, used it for IE), "IE has cookie filtering, but you have to be a programmer to use it. Opera's isn't exactly easy either." Sounds like they're even, huh? Yet they colored Opera's square blue (best rating) and colored IE's red (worst). Funny stuff. They gave Mozilla 'easy' in blue for auto form filling. That's one area where we deserved 'suck' in red. "Moz's form and password data editor is excellent and easy to use." They obviously looked at it, couldn't figure it out, and decided to give it a good review because it looked powerful (even though it's not). "Only Opera has the super fast MDI interface" They should lose points for having a stone-age MDI interface. "Moz has some limited tabbed options if your mouse supports it." Stupid 2 button windows losers :). [HERES WERE WE GO THROUGH OPERAS FEATURE LIST AND LIST EVERYTHING STUPID LITTLE FEATURE IE AND MOZ DON'T HAVE SO THEY GET MORE RED BOXES (no, we won't go through IE/Moz's feature list so we get red boxes)] That's as long as I could stand it... remind me not to visit "searchengineworld.com" again. /jmd
