Ben Bucksch wrote: > Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > >>I was just reading the nice article at >>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/27934.html and was struck by >>the "External Links" section.... I have to wonder: Why exactly are we >>not updating the known vulnerabilities page? > > Actually, comparing the pages, most of them *are* listed, not? And the > document history says last change Oct 22, done by mstoltz. > > However, it does seem to be the case that only those bugs are listed > there which the press or bugtraq already reported about. That's not the > point of the page IMO.
The Register article was from last May, when only one item was listed on the page.
