> This is quite an opportunity. It's a select few projects that see that
> level of ubiquity. And yet mozilla.org seems indifferent, if not
> altogether dismissive of this situation.
Who @mozilla.org has been dismissive? Or indifferent, for that matter?
I'm rattling cages by email, and drivers are following the API freeze
work that valeski is leading (see mozilla.porkjockeys). mozilla1.0
needs stability, performance, and frozen APIs to existing
implementations -- not any particular new feature (as the roadmap says).
I don't speak for netscape.com, but I'll say what all staff and drivers
@mozilla.org know: being a system library on many distros is a victory
condition, and it requires API freezes and a decent versioning story.
We're working on the API freeze part, and still limping along on COM's
versioning story. Suggestions?
/be
