Peter Annema wrote:
> I'm thinking about killing most of nsIXULBrowserWindow , which was just a
> scriptable interface for the then non-scriptable nsIWebProgressListener, so that
> may be a bad idea.
>
Yes, that might bad idea if that interface goes down the drain.
>
> Since nsIWebProgressListener is scriptable now, I suggest you use that. For a JS
> example, see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=26364.
>
I've started to use it a lot (loading urls, session history etc.), but not for
browser load notifications. So I'd better get in sync with the tree...Thanks!
/martin
