Chris Waterson wrote: > <...> > > Also, it appears that it is currently not possible to use a ``named > literal string'' as a static class member. Ought we support that? There is a section on bad statics with constructors in the portability guide. So doing that might break on some platforms, esp. those that don't have wchar (so you really need the constructor to do the conversion). Axel > > chris
- Re: safe to use preprocessor mnemonics with NS_NAMED_LITERAL... Peter Annema
- Re: safe to use preprocessor mnemonics with NS_NAMED_LI... David Bradley
- Axel Hecht
