Chris Waterson wrote:
> 
<...>
> 
> Also, it appears that it is currently not possible to use a ``named
> literal string'' as a static class member. Ought we support that?

There is a section on bad statics with constructors in the portability
guide. So doing that might break on some platforms, esp. those that
don't have wchar (so you really need the constructor to do the
conversion).

Axel
> 
> chris

Reply via email to