Christof Meerwald wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:15:14 -0700, Alec Flett wrote: > >>Christof Meerwald wrote: >> >>>It seems that "netwerk/base/public/Makefile" is missing from MAKEFILES_xpcom >>>in allmakefiles.sh. >>> >>The build seems to be building for most people, as tinderbox is staying >>green (aka "building cleanly") for unix: >> > > And how many are building *standalone* XPCOM/XPConnect?
Adding the Makefile isn't the right thing here, IMHO. We shouldn't have dependencies on netwerk from XPCOM, but I understand that we're going to make STANDALONE the only mode of building for XPCOM, so it's a temporary setback. Mike
