Rick Parrish wrote:
> Yes. Implement the same interfaces and register the component under the > same contract ID. This assumes that the client program references the > component by contract ID (a text string) and not class ID (a 128 bit > number). Duplicating class-ids is "a bad thing" (TM). That's what I was fearing. And since this is implementation-dependent, I guess I'm stuck. > If the client program requests the component by class id then you're > stuck. Of course, this is mozilla so you've probably got the source and > can hack away to make things work. Well, I can. But the idea was to reuse Mozilla, not to rewrite it :) > -rick Thanks, YA P.S. : I guess I found another workaround for my problem. -- Being paranoid means believing that this line is meant for you.
