Brodie Thiesfield wrote:

I'm using the Mozilla source as a platform for our product. We use only C++ code (no XUL interfaces). We (ab)use the HTML parser, char converters, strings, XPCOM, etc. Is there any need for me to distribute the XPT files with the application? It seems that XPT is only used by JS, so it won't be required if we have no XUL, correct?

Regards,
Brodie


XPT files are also used to implement the stuff in xpcom/proxy, so be careful what you dump. XPCOM proxies are not used that often, but perhaps in some critical places they are used. For example, you probably do not want to get rid of necko.xpt, but there may be others as well. You could save some bytes by shipping only the .xpt files that you actually need. XPT is like an archiving format... you can combine multiple xpt files into one (see xpt_link). necko.xpt is actually a combination of xpt files.

-Darin
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-xpcom mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-xpcom

Reply via email to