I think that muddying up the codebase for this would be a loss esp when it's so easy to write a frontend script that encodes seperate files on seperate computers. Who has so much to encode that they need a cluster but only has a few files? On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Takehiro Tominaga wrote: > I think WAN-distributed mp3 encoder is hard and not a good idea, too > because of the network data flow. > > But a computer cluster connecting with not WAN but LAN, the distributed > encoder would be a good plan. > > The latest GOGO-no-coder supports multi thread. > With this feature, it use multi CPU to encode and can do faster encoding. > > Maybe we can write the mp3 encoding cluster based on this. -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding code support distr... Stephen Scheck
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding code supp... Nick Burch
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding code ... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding c... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encodi... Stephen Scheck
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the e... Frank Baumgart
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the e... Ben Tucker
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding c... Acy Stapp
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encodi... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the e... Andre Pang
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does t... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: do... mikecheng
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: do... Andre Pang
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME: does the encoding code supp... Stapp, Acy