My PPro200 does ~1.6x with just -h and nothing else. pretty linear in scale
with Athlon (600/5*1.6=192MHz :)
To the developers: Which is more important, float performance or integer
performance? I thought the reason MMX didn't help much was because encoders
were float heavy. Would it be possible to change all the float calculations
to table look up and speed things up?
>From: Ivo van Heel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Hardware reccomendation
>Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 20:04:32 +0200
>
>Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the most important
>factors. But anything you buy today will have no problem encoding
>(even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.
>My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
