Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 22/56/JS - Lame vs Fraunhofer

[Monty]

> > From: Shawn Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > 
> > I forgot to add that Fraunhofer also sounded better at 48k 
> > than Lame did at 56k... Maybe this filtering is why.

Also, please use a recent version of LAME!  Mark has put in a ton of low 
bitrate work in the past month.  Lame 3.6x can't compare to current.

Monty

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )