We know that LAME now has roughly the same quality of MP3Enc 3.1. But,
as far as I am concerned, full huffman search hasn't been implemented
on LAME yet. I've noticed LAME 3.8x produces better quality than 3.70,
and I presume the main reason is the more efficient huffman coding of
Takehiro. MP3Enc does full huffman search on qualilty 9. So, should MP3Enc
with -qual 9 switch sound a bit better than LAME -h? Please let me know.
__________________________________________________
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
