> You're right Mark, compared to Lame 387 MMX --abr 128 Xing is only two
> times faster Bo)
>
> Regards,
> Wim Speekenbrink

Using 160kbps for both LAME and Xing, encoding "Dire straits - telegraph road"

LAME takes about 1.5 times longer than Xing.

I thought the difference was greater, but I had been dealing with mono files
back then :)

Owen.

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to