Gabriel Bouvigne wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to predict this timeshift? Does anyone know if it's a
> variable based on encoding or constant?
>
> It's because of the encoder delay. Now (3.90) Lame writes a kind of header
> into the first frame, and one of the fields of this header is the encoder
> delay.
Given that could a well written decoder strip it off and give time and
length coherency between source and result?
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
////////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
To contribute your unused processor cycles to the fight against cancer:
http://www.intel.com/cure
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\///////////////////////////////////////
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
