Hi, On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: >I read someone succeeded in modifying the blade encoder to be capable for >parallel encoding. AFAIK was the result not byte for byte same as decoded in >the serial way but sounded normal (no clicks or something). > >Has somebody already succeeded with doing that with the lame encoder? > I haven't tried, but as I read this I thought of the --nogap option in LAME. Would it be possible to chop up a large WAV file in pieces of approriate length, encode them at the same time and then merge them to one large MP3? Not quite. LAME needs to know about the previous WAV file.
But what if I split my WAV into, say, 4 WAV files and encoded them in two batches: 1,2,3 to 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 2,3,4 to 2.2, 3.2, 4.2. If the size of these WAVs is selected with care, not much extra work needs to be done on the files that will be doubly encoded (1,4 big, 2,4 small). Would it be possible to merge 1.1, 2.1, 3.2, 4.2 to one big MP3? /Stefan -- [ Stefan Ohlsson ] � http://www.cixit.se/ � [ 020-4702019 / +46-709-561314 ] _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
