On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 08:51 AM, Toby Speight wrote:
Jim> just encodes the two tracks as two separate .mp3 files.That's the idea - two MP3 files that can be played back sequentially without any audible gap. If you encoded them separately, you'd get a "hiccup" between the two, due to introduced latency for the bit reservoir. Some players introduce their own gaps, but on ones that handle this correctly, you won't hear the transition from one file to the next - you would without --nogap.
hmm, I didn't get that... thanks for the clarification!
This seems like a natural follow-on to the --nogap option... are there any plans to add gapless extraction to LAME (so I don't have to use another tool)?If you want a single MP3 file as output, you should concatenate your raw unencoded files (e.g. with sox or xwave), and encode the result.
TIA, Jim
--
If you can eat a big can of stew, you can make a high performance antenna.
- Gregory Rehm (?)
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
