I dont think so.... resampling from 96 to 44.1 would throw away samples, so it would not make much of a difference compared to if the original samples were at 44.1 to beging with.
On 7/31/06, Marty Huntzberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering if by using the following: > > lame -b 128 --resample 44.1 low.wav high.mp3 > > if a 96 kbits stream audiodumped to low.wav by mplayer would actually be a > higher quality and better sounding mp3 (high.mp3) that would have 128 > kbits? > > Marty > > > _______________________________________________ > mp3encoder mailing list > mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder > _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
