On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 19:08:25 +0000, Rory McNamara wrote: > Surely that would cause problems based on ordering? > For example, if name was ls, and lsplaylist comes after ls in > mpc_table (which it does) > when we come to the end of our for loop, lsplaylist struct would be in > our local copy when the correct > match is ls. Also matches would be 2, so the ternary would fail.
No, because we're still counting the number of matches and returning NULL if there isn't exactly a single match. > Admittedly, my implementation is dependant on shorter names being > before longer names. That sounds fragile. --Ben _______________________________________________ mpd-devel mailing list mpd-devel@musicpd.org http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel
