On 09/02/2016 19:55, Max Kellermann wrote: > On 2016/02/07 22:11, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com> > wrote: >> The mpd source code uses the C++11 <atomic> functionality, which >> internally is implemented using the __atomic_*() gcc built-ins. On >> certain architectures, the __atomic_*() built-ins are implemented in >> the libatomic library that comes with the rest of the gcc runtime. Due >> to this, code using <atomic> might need to link against libatomic, >> otherwise one hits build issues such as: > > I would expect the C++ compiler to figure out the link-time > dependencies of its own standard library. Why isn't that happening on > SPARC? This looks like a toolchain bug, doesn't it?
Why that, it's always been so for libstdc++, libsupc++, libgcc... ok maybe not libgcc. It's not the oddest thing I've seen when porting stuff anyway. François. _______________________________________________ mpd-devel mailing list mpd-devel@musicpd.org http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel
