The headers are different since a different paper is being cited. There
is however a command line switch to override this default behavior.
The footers tend to have more databases listed than a typical ncbi blast
scenario. But I believe even ncbi blast produces identical output if you
were to have a DB split in N parts.
Otherwise nothing stands out to my mind.
Waibhav Tembe wrote:
Hello List,
I understand that there are minor differences in e value computation
and the order in which hits with similar statistics/alignments are reported
for blastall and mpiblast programs. Other than these two, are there any
significant differences in the outputs that need to be kept in mind
while comparing these two outputs?
Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mpiblast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpiblast-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mpiblast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpiblast-users
