Chuming Chen wrote:
Hi all, Does the query size of mpiblast effect the total performance?
Each blast operation is a function of the length of the query sequence, as well as the length of the database. Usually people talk about the average query length as well as the size of the query.
It took about 17 seconds per sequence when I run 721 sequences (542K) against 22G database.
You have that here: 542k bp/721 seq gives you a rough average.
But when I run 88532 sequences (47M) against the same database, it took about 1 minute.
Same thing here. The two may have very different sequence length mixes.
Can the performance be improved if the query sequence is in a relatively smaller size?
Depends upon the algorithm being used.
Thank you for your kind comments and suggestions. Chuming Chen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bioclusters maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
-- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mpiblast-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpiblast-users
