You need to look at the figures on the GMP website and look at the asymptotics. That has nothing to do with Magma.
Bill. 2008/12/21 Jason Martin <jason.worth.mar...@gmail.com>: > >> By the way, the code you posted has a variable missing in the final >> printf. It always returns 0.00. > > Sorry, that was a version control issue. The numbers I posted below > are for correct code (with the "result" variable printed. > > I don't get the error message that you are reporting when building. > I'll try building on sage.math and see what happens. > > I'm also confused about what exactly you're saying the problem is. My > testing shows that for big enough numbers, the Moller patches in MPIR > are faster than the un-patched MPIR. I'm not comparing it against > Magma because I don't have any basis for the comparison. > > Perhaps you should send me the exact numbers you're talking about and > I'll try them with: > > MPIR rev 1487 (pre-patch) > MPIR current > and > GMP 4.2.4 > > --jason > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
