On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Jason Martin <jason.worth.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 22:03:43 Mariah wrote: >>> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 >>> >>> 2241.9 2251 cicero (pentium4-pc-linux-gnu) >>> 3371.5 3369.3 cleo (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) >>> 6024.5 7437.8 eno (core2-unknown-linux-gnu) >>> 6022.2 7387.1 fulvia (core2-pc-solaris2.10) >>> 3367.8 3369.5 iras (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) >>> 1341.3 1343.6 mark (ultrasparc3-sun-solaris2.10) >>> 6100 7421.1 menas (core2-unknown-linux-gnu) >>> >>> Mariah >> >> K10 crushes core-2 (intel fanbois hide their heads in shame :) >> >> gmp-4.2.4 mpir-0.9.0 r1614-k8-branch >> 6014 7379 10118 box1 >> (k8-unknown-linux-gnu) 1.8Ghz >> 9301 11659 15514 cuda1 >> (k10-unknown-linux-gnu) 2.6Ghz >> > > I don't think that the core2 can get much faster... the addmul (and > friends) are running just shy of 4 cycles/limb which is the max > throughput rate for the 64-bit multiply instruction on core2. I'm > appropriately hiding in shame :-) >
Do you have any remarks to make about where you think Itanium could go (compared to where it is now) if it were given suitable attention? William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
